Legal Opinion
McMahon v. Henkel
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Action to set aside a liquor tax certificate.
1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.
The defendant Margaret E. Henkel is the owner of premises at No. 96 East Market street in the city of Corning, which premises have been continuously used for saloon purposes since on or about April 1,1902.
The plaintiffs in this action were formerly tenants of defendant Henkel in said premises, first, under a .written lease dated January 10,1907, which expired on or about April 1, 1910, and secondly, under a written lease made between the plaintiffs and defendant Henkel for a five-year- term, which expired March 31, 1915.
*86While plaintiffs occupied the premises No. 96 East Market street,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Hope v. . MastermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- In re FarleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1912
- Matter of FarleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
- Clement v. Viscosi, New York County Courts1909
- In re ClementNew York Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brunner v. Diogenes Brewing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1916