Legal Opinion

Clement v. Viscosi

New York County Courts

Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Proceeding to cancel liquor tax certificate under section 27 of the Liquor Tax Law, as consolidated, and motion to make a party thereto an assignee, whose transfer is not of record, as provided in section 26 of the same statute.

1Opinion of the CourtPritchard, J.

This proceeding is brought to cancel the liquor tax certificate issued to the respondent to traffic in liquors at the Hotel Normandie'in the city of Rome, Oneida county, on the ground of violation of the Liquor Tax Law, in keeping a disorderly house, prohibited by subdivision “ E ” of section 31 of the Liquor Tax Law, now section 30.

The answer denies any violation and makes two objections to the granting of the prayer of the petitioner, namely, that the proceeding was not commenced within thirty days after the surrender of the certificate, as provided by section 25, now 24, of said law, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People ex rel. A. Hupfel's Sons v. CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. In re CullinanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  3. In re ClementNew York Supreme Court · 1909
  4. In re ClementNew York Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McMahon v. HenkelNew York Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API