Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smothers v. Mihm

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 13, 1994No. 93-895PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Claimant has already been found to be permanently and totally disabled. Once this determination has been made, “the employee shall receive an award to continue until his death.” (Emphasis added.) R.C. 4123.58(A). The lifetime nature of the award negates the need for continuing medical proof on claimant’s behalf.

The character of a permanent total disability award does not, however, mean that the award is completely immune from later review. If, for example, the commission learns that the claimant is working or engaging in activity inconsis*568tent with his permanent total disability status, the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Weimer v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State Ex Rel. B & C MacHine Co. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State ex rel. Board of Education v. JohnstonOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  4. State ex rel. Saunders v. Metal Container Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Schultz v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Schultz v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Alesci v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State ex rel. Alesci v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State Ex Rel. Lynch v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API