Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schultz v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 2002No. 2001-0001PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 96 Ohio St.3d 27.] THE STATE EX REL. SCHULTZ, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Schultz v. Indus. Comm.,

2002-Ohio-3316.] Workers’ compensation—Ability to do any work warrants a denial of permanent total disability compensation benefits—Claimant who performs sustained remunerable activity without pay demonstrates that he or she is capable of doing the same work for remuneration. (No. 2001-0001—Submitted April 9, 2002—Decided July 10, 2002.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Stephenson v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State ex rel. Schultz v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State ex rel. Smothers v. MihmOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Lawson v. ForgeOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State ex rel. Seibert v. Richard Cyr, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State ex rel. Bonnlander v. Harmon (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State ex rel. Kirby v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Timmerman Truss, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API