Legal Opinion

State v. Gallegos

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 2009No. 20070212PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINS, Justice:

T1 Defendant James M. Gallegos asks us to reverse his criminal convictions for two counts of enticing a minor over the internet, alleging several points of error below. Specifically, Gallegos argues that Utah's Internet Enticement Statute (the enticement statute) is unconstitutionally vague, both facially and as applied to him. Gallegos also contends that the trial court erred in reversing a pretrial decision to allow him to present a voluntary termination affirmative defense. Additionally, Gallegos argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hill v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. City of Chicago v. MoralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
  5. State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 2006

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. PereaUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RobinsonUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. BerrielUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Miller v. Utah Department of TransportationUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Gunn Hill Dairy Properties, LLC v. Los Angeles Department of Water & PowerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API