Legal Opinion

United States v. Todd Tykarsky A/K/A Toddyty63 A/K/A Golpher12345

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 10, 2006No. 04-4092PublishedCited by 146 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal from a conviction and sentence in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, we join several sister courts of appeals in holding that the involvement of an actual minor, as distinguished from a government decoy, is not a prerequisite to conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) (actual or attempted persuasion of a minor to engage in illicit sexual activity) or 18 U.S.C. § 2423(b) (traveling for the purpose of engaging in illicit sexual activity). We also reject the myriad other attacks Defendant Todd Tykarsky makes on…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by146 opinions

  1. United States v. BrandCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. JimenezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. United States v. GagliardiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  5. Ex parte IngramCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2017

141 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API