State v. Levin
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals
DURRANT, Justice:
INTRODUCTION
¶ 1 The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against self-incrimination. 1 To preserve this right, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that defendants subjected to custodial interrogation are entitled to a Miranda warning. 2 Where such a warning is not given, any incriminating statements made by a defendant during the custodial interrogation are excluded from evidence. 3 We granted certiorari in this case to clarify the standard of review to be applied by a Utah appellate court in reviewing a trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
- Murray v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.