Legal Opinion

State v. Levin

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 2006No. 20050001PublishedCited by 102 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

On Certiorari to the Utah Court of Appeals

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

¶ 1 The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution protects against self-incrimination. 1 To preserve this right, the U.S. Supreme Court has held that defendants subjected to custodial interrogation are entitled to a Miranda warning. 2 Where such a warning is not given, any incriminating statements made by a defendant during the custodial interrogation are excluded from evidence. 3 We granted certiorari in this case to clarify the standard of review to be applied by a Utah appellate court in reviewing a trial…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by102 opinions

  1. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Menzies v. GaletkaUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Manzanares v. ByingtonUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Murray v. Utah Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2013

97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API