Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Siemon

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 25, 1940No. Civ. 2295PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in an election contest in which the contestant and respondent was declared elected by a majority of one vote to the office of city councilman for the sixth ward of the city of Bakersfield, and the judgment directed the issuance of a certificate of election to contestant.

The election was the regular city general election held April 11, 1939, under the Bakersfield city charter (Stats. 1915, p. 1568) which provides that such elections are subject to the general election laws of the state (id., p. 1572).

Tbe controversy arises over the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Oakland Paving Co. v. HiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Russell v. McDowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Yosemite Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Beneficial Loan Society, Ltd. v. HaightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Otsuka v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In Re QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  3. State v. NixonIndiana Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Cottingham v. State Board of ExaminersMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API