Legal Opinion
Mobley v. Continental Casualty Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 11, 2005No. CIV.A.04-0287 JDBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
In this action, plaintiff James Mobley seeks to recover benefits pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Presently before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by defendant Continental Casualty Co. (“Continental” or “defendant”). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny defendant’s motion without prejudice.
BACKGROUND 1
Continental has a group disability policy (“policy”) that it issued to Columbia Hospital for Women Foundation, Inc. and Subsidiary Corporations (“Columbia Hospital”).…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Rex T. KEARNEY, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Jerome D. Jackson v. Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & DunnerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mobley v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Becker v. Weinberg Group, Inc. Pension TrustDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Cornish v. United States Life InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2009