Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Police Court of Riverside

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1911No. L.A. No. 2670PublishedCited by 15 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Riverside County awarding a peremptory Writ of Prohibition. F. E. Densmore, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the superior court awarding a peremptory writ of prohibition. An action was commenced in the police court of the city of Riverside by E. Carlin against A. Simpson (respondent herein), to recover one hundred and twenty-five dollars alleged to be due upon a promissory note. Simpson appeared and demurred to the complaint, upon the ground that the police court had no jurisdiction of the subject-matter of the action. The demurrer being overruled, this proceeding was instituted in the superior court to prohibit the police court and the judge thereof from…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hamberger v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Chaplin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  3. Consolidated Adjustment Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Moore v. Municipal Court of Salinas Judicial Dist.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Frazier v. TerrillArizona Supreme Court · 1946

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API