Hearne v. De Young
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County and from an order denying a new trial. Lucien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment based upon the verdict of a jury awarding to the plaintiff, and jointly I against both defendants, the sum of ten thousand dollars damages for the publication in the San Francisco Chronicle of an alleged libel. The appeal is also prosecuted from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The defendant De Young was the proprietor and publisher, and the defendant Blunt was the San Diego City correspondent, of the paper. The article in question was -written by Blunt and forwarded to San Francisco, where it was published without the knowledge of De Young.
The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harris v. ZanoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Maynard v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Edwards v. San Jose Printing & Publishing SocietyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Torrey v. FieldSupreme Court of Vermont · 1838
- Chamberlin v. VanceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Emde v. San Joaquin County Central Labor CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Bates v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.