Legal Opinion

Manley v. Harer

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 25, 1925No. 5,633PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This is an action to recover damages for libel. The com- ' plaint embraces three causes of action. Defendants demurred generally to each. The demurrer having been sustained and the plaintiff having refused to plead further the court ordered judgment entered against him, and from this judgment he has appealed.

The three canses of action are so nearly alike that in so far as the instant problem is involved a discussion of one will suffice for all. The innuendo in the second and third is somewhat different from that in the first, but if the language which is the basis of each clause is libelous…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Paxton v. WoodwardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  3. Denney v. Northwestern Credit Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Robinson v. CoulterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  5. Quinn v. Review Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Memphis Publishing Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Smith v. Los Angeles Bookbinders Union No. 63California Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Keller v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Peabody v. BarhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. Dillard v. ShattuckNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API