Legal Opinion

Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1950No. 5155PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Petitioner Sears, Roebuck & Co., the employer (hereinafter called Sears), brings before us for review an award of the Industrial Commission of Arizona, dated July 29, 1948, allowing Helen Harris, one of its employees, accident benefits in the sum of $7,431.13 and compensation of $1,-646.16 now due, plus the additional sum of $3.61 per day to continue during applicant’s disability. Sears is a self-insurer, qualifying under the provisions of subsection 3, section 56-932, A. C.A. 1939.

This case, which represents a unique situation in the administration of the workmen’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Goodyear Aircraft Corporation v. GilbertArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Guy F. Atkinson Co. v. KinseyArizona Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Clarke v. Ward Baking Co., New Jersey Department of Labor Workmen's Compensation Bureau1941

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. McCampbell v. Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. English v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Foxworth v. Florida Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Luvaul v. A. Ray Barker Motor CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API