Legal Opinion

Wm. Meinel v. Jennie Meinel

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 15, 1932No. Appeal 37PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is an appeal by respondent from the order of court reducing the amount of alimony pendente lite from $100 per week to $60 per week, on a rule to vacate the order for alimony, where no application for a reduction had been made.

On August 25, 1930, the lower court upon petition, answer and depositions, entered an order that the husband, libellant, pay to the wife, respondent, alimony pendente lite at the rate of $100 per week, without prejudice to the right of either party to apply later for a modification.

On August 30, 1932, a final decree was entered divorcing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Karmany v. KarmanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  2. Norman S. White v. Beatrice M. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Ray v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Norman S. White v. Beatrice M. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Kuehnle v. KuehnleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chaney v. ChaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Homler v. HomlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  3. Mather v. Mather, (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Gilbert v. GilbertSuperior Court of Delaware · 1961
  5. Smith v. Smith, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API