Legal Opinion

Kuehnle v. Kuehnle

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 1, 1931No. Appeal 324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bt

Bardrige, J.,

This appeal is from an order of the court below directing the respondent in a divorce action to pay $15 a week for the support of his wife.

It appears from the evidence that the husband, at the time of the marriage, owned a two-story house divided into two apartments, which he subsequently conveyed to his wife. The libellant is now living in one of the apartments and the other is vacant. He also assigned to her certain building and loan association stock, the valuation of which is approximately $5,000. The libellant recently started a hairdressing business, from which…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Waldron v. WaldronSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1866
  2. Karmany v. KarmanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  3. Fernald v. FernaldSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
  4. Ray v. RaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kohler v. KohlerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gangloff v. GangloffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Mather v. Mather, (No. 2)Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  3. Wm. Meinel v. Jennie MeinelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Ambrose v. Ambrose, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Franklin County1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API