Goldhirsh v. McNear
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtPerretta, J.
By appeal from a Land Court judgment in these consolidated cases, we are required to determine whether a carriage house, which was converted to a single-family structure, is entitled to the protection afforded residential structures by the second “except” clause of the first paragraph of G. L. c. 40A, § 6, and the similar by-law provision. We conclude that the building is entitled to that protection, but, because the defendant board failed to consider whether the owners’ changes to the residential structure would increase its nonconforming nature, we reverse the judgment.
1. The history of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mendes v. Board of Appeals of BarnstableMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
- Willard v. Board of Appeals of OrleansMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Fitzsimonds v. Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1985
- Chongris v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1984
- Cummings v. City Council of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Appeal of MiserocchiSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
- Britton v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
- Murphy v. Town of DuxburyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Dial Away Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Deadrick v. Zoning Board of Appeals of ChathamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2014
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.