Legal Opinion
Mendes v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided April 17, 1990No. 89-P-188PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Rogers and Mamey (the “owners”) operate a construction company and are the owners of a parcel of land, containing close to four acres, on Osterville/West Barnstable Road in Barnstable (the “locus”), located in a residence zoning district. Under successive variances, granted to them in 1969, 1972, and 1980, the owners erected a building for construction shop work, an addition to that building, and a storage yard for construction materials and equipment.
In 1985, the owners wished to add still further to their building but a change in Barnstable’s zoning by-law ruled out cutting another slice of…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pendergast v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
- Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Building DepartmentMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Cullen v. Building Inspector of North AttleboroughMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1968
- Subaru of New England v. BD. OF APPEALS, CANTONMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979
- Everpure Ice Manufacturing Co. v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Mendoza v. Licensing BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Preston v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
- Tsagronis v. Board of Appeals of WarehamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1992
- Bellalta v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Barron Chevrolet, Inc. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.