Dial Away Co. v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtDreben, J.
The question before us is whether, under the Auburn zoning by-law, an undersized lot retains its protected character as a buildable lot twenty-three years after a nonconforming dwelling on the lot was razed. The building inspector of the town and the defendant board of appeals said no. On the plaintiff’s appeal, pursuant to G. L. c. 40A, § 17, a judge in the Superior Court, on cross motions for summary judgment, ordered the defendants to issue a building permit and annulled the decision of the board of appeals denying the plaintiff a permit. We reverse.
Many of the facts are not in dispute. In…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Adamowicz v. Town of IpswichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Planning Board v. Board of AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
- Derby Refining Co. v. City of ChelseaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- Willard v. Board of Appeals of OrleansMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987
- Berliner v. FeldmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bellalta v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Wells v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- Gale v. Zoning Board of Appeals of GloucesterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2011
- Mauri v. Zoning Board of AppealsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
- Town of Orange v. ShayMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.