Fullerton Lumber Co. v. Torborg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1DissentGehl, J.
The majority agree that the ten-year restraint imposed by the contract is unreasonably long. This court has consistently held that an unreasonably long restraint is unenforceable, void, and illegal. Cottington v. Swan, 128 Wis. 321, 107 N. W. 336; My Laundry Co. v. *149Schmeling, 129 Wis. 597, 109 N. W. 540; Durbrow Commission Co. v. Donner, 201 Wis. 175, 229 N. W. 635; Milwaukee Linen Supply Co. v. Ring, 210 Wis. 467, 246 N. W. 567; Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. Lueth, 213 Wis. 42, 250 N. W. 819, and that a void contract, one against public policy, cannot be.made the foundation of any action,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Davis v. La Crosse Hospital Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Wisconsin Ice & Coal Co. v. LuethWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- Fleckenstein Bros. v. FleckensteinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1908
- Trenton Potteries Co. v. OliphantSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- My Laundry Co. v. SchmelingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.