Legal Opinion
Zoeller v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 12, 2005No. 04-1496CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT
According to his first amended complaint, plaintiff Bruce Zoeller calls himself a “Native Perennial Plant farmer and seedsman,” with his principal place of business in NE Kan*451sas/SE Nebraska. According to the plaintiff, his activities include “native plant production for seed, forage, fiber, fuel and charitable research purposes.”
In 1999, the United States Army opened parcels of land at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas for lease and advertised for leasing based on competitive bidding. On June 22, 1999, the Army leased three parcels of land to plaintiff, designated…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rollock Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Cross Continent Development, LLC v. Town of AkronDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2010
- Emiabata v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Phillips/May Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Pinero v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.