Legal Opinion

Emiabata v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 30, 2009No. 06-702CPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

SMITH, Senior Judge:

Plaintiff, Philip Emiabata, acting as the principal of Nova Express, filed this suit to recover $2.5 million in damages for wrongs allegedly committed by the United States Postal Service and its employees in connection with contract nos. HCR 78653 and HCR 78640. In his Complaint, Mr. Emiaba-ta alleges that the United States Postal Service breached its implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by interfering with the performance of Nova Express’ contracts.

Now before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, pursuant to RCFC 56(b), which…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SoliminoSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rios-Pineiro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
  2. Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  3. Gonzalez v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012
  4. Pinero v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API