Bowling v. City of Oxford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLake, J.
Upon a motion for judgment as of nonsuit the evidence offered by the plaintiff must be taken to be true and must be interpreted in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Every reasonable inference favorable to the plaintiff must be drawn therefrom.
When a city or town engages in an activity which is not an exercise of its governmental function but is proprietary in nature, the city, like an individual or a privately owned corporation engaged in the same activity, is liable in damages for injury to persons or property due to its negligence or other wrongful act in the conduct of such…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Britt v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Millar v. Town of WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Glenn Ex Rel. Glenn v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Fisher v. New Bern.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dale Ex Rel. Dale v. City of MorgantonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- City of Asheville v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Champion v. WallerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- AGI Associates, LLC v. City of Hickory, NCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Robinson v. Nash CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.