Legal Opinion

Colman v. Button

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1933No. Civil No. 3232PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

This is an action by James B. Button, superintendent of banks, to enforce the constitutional and statutory liability of C. H. Colman as a stockholder of the Yuma Valley Bank, in course of liquidation. Judgment went in favor of plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

The controlling facts are as follows: On February 18, 1929, the defendant subscribed and paid for 80 shares, at $25 per share, of the capital stock of the Yuma Valley Bank, thereafter to be organized to take over the assets and affairs of the Yuma National Bank then being liquidated. The Yuma Valley Bank was formally organized for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Coffin Brothers & Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Hook v. HoffmanArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Wehby v. SpurwayArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Watkins v. Record Photographing Abstract Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ansley v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  2. Ansley v. Banner HealthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API