Legal Opinion

Bayer v. Winton Motor Car Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1916No. Docket No. 135PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Wayne; Van Zile, J. Assumpsit by Joseph Bayer against the Winton Motor Car Company for breach of a contract of warranty for the sale of an automobile. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtSteere, J.

In July, 1911, plaintiff purchased from defendant for the sum of $1,100 one of its 1908 model automobiles, first sold by it when new for $4,500 to a customer who used it until 1911, when it was taken back by defendant in an exchange allowance upon the purchase price of a new model of similar type.

In this action, begun November 2, 1914, plaintiff recovered a verdict and judgment against defendant of over $1.800, being for moneys claimed to have been expended by him, without any value received, for the purchase price of this car and expenses incurred in connection with it.

Negotiations for the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marthinson v. North British & Mercantile InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. McCray Refrigerator & Cold Storage Co. v. Woods & ZentMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Hubbardston Lumber Co. v. BatesMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Campau v. LaffertyMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Fairbanks Steam Shovel Co. v. Holt & JefferyWashington Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Salzman v. MaldaverMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Curby v. MastenbrookMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Regula v. GerberTuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1946
  4. Lamb v. OttoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Kirby v. Gibson Refrigerator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API