Legal Opinion
Salzman v. Maldaver
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided September 11, 1946No. Docket No. 47, Calendar No. 43,406PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Starr, J..
Plaintiffs are engaged in business in New York city nnder the name of American Surplus Trading Company. Defendants are engaged in business in Detroit under the name of Michigan Salvage Company. On July 25, 1945, these parties entered into a contract which provided in part:
“Party of the first part (defendants) agrees to sell, and party of the second part (plaintiffs) agrees to buy a surplus lot of approximately 790,000. pounds of offal aluminum sheets, various types, gauges, shapes, and sizes, list attached, less approximately, 40,000 pounds of 24 S. T. in .025, .032, and .040 gauge…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- McCray Refrigerator & Cold Storage Co. v. Woods & ZentMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Leckie v. BrayWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
- Doyle v. KammeraadMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
- Bayer v. Winton Motor Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Dunn Road MacHinery Co. v. Charlevoix Abstract & Engineering Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Goodwin, Inc v. Orson E Coe Pontiac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Craig v. Everett M. Brooks Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1967
- Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Andersons, Inc. v. Horton Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Heritage Resources, Inc. v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2009
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.