Legal Opinion
Marshall Field & Co. v. Haish
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided July 20, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Assumpsit, on a contract of guaranty. Error to the Circuit Court of He Kalb County; the Hon. Charles A. Bishop, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the May term, 1899.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dibell
On January 25, 1892, Charles W. Haish signed and deliv- ■ ered to Marshall Field & Co. an instrument of that date, the body of which was as follows:
“ For and in consideration of one dollar, to me in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, and the further consideration that Marshall Field & Co. sell goods and merchandise upon credit to W. E. Hart of Malta, county of BeKalb, and State of Illinois, I do hereby guarantee to Marshall Field & Co., the payment at maturity (waiving notice of non-payment), and in accordance with the terms of sale, of the prices and values of all goods…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Frieden v. Cluett, Peabody & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1925
- Furst v. BurySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
- Furst v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Royal Tailors v. NewtonUtah Supreme Court · 1925