Legal Opinion

Royal Tailors v. Newton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 17, 1925No. 4238PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The appellant, plaintiff below, appeals from a judgment that "the Royal Tailors take nothing by its complaint herein against the defendant." The action is founded upon a writing, in form a letter, alleged to be a contract of guaranty executed by respondent, defendant below. It is admitted that the respondent signed the writing. It is addressed to the appellant and is as follows:

"Letter of Guaranty.
"To the Royal Tailors, Chicago, U.S.A. — Gentlemen: For and in consideration of the Royal Tailors, a corporation, extending credit to R.M. Gates Co., of Salt Lake City, Utah, for goods, wares, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Davis v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  2. Hibernia Bank & Trust Co. v. Succession of CancienneSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
  3. Cowan v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Cowan v. . RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. J. R. Watkins Medical Co. v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Zions First National Bank v. HurstUtah Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API