Legal Opinion

Furst v. Bury

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1933No. File No. 7445PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This appeal presents a single legal question, sought to be raised in the court below by the interposing of a demurrer and a ruling thereon. It appears from the complaint that the following writing was executed between the parties in 1925:

“Credit Sales Agreement
“This agreement made and entered into at Freeport, Illinois, by and between Frank E. Furst and Fred G. Thomas, co-partners, doing business under the name of Furst and Thomas of Freeport, Illinois, and E. M. Hess of Geddes, S. D., hereinafter called the dealer witnesseth:
“That,- whereas, the aforesaid dealer wishes to engage in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Marshall Field & Co. v. HaishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
  3. Furst v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. BelcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Furst v. BurySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API