Legal Opinion
Furst v. Bury
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided July 31, 1933No. File No. 7445PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This appeal presents a single legal question, sought to be raised in the court below by the interposing of a demurrer and a ruling thereon. It appears from the complaint that the following writing was executed between the parties in 1925:
“Credit Sales Agreement
“This agreement made and entered into at Freeport, Illinois, by and between Frank E. Furst and Fred G. Thomas, co-partners, doing business under the name of Furst and Thomas of Freeport, Illinois, and E. M. Hess of Geddes, S. D., hereinafter called the dealer witnesseth:
“That,- whereas, the aforesaid dealer wishes to engage in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bradshaw v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Marshall Field & Co. v. HaishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899
- Furst v. LarsenMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
3Cited by2 opinions
- Thomas v. BelcherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Furst v. BurySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934