Legal Opinion

Furst v. Larsen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1930No. Docket No. 93, Calendar No. 35,120PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, C. J.

In February, 1923, Adolph G. Larsen, then living on a farm in Covert township, Van Burén county, near Coloma, wanted to engage in selling, in that vicinity, medicinal products of plaintiff company, and entered into a contract to that end and procured two of his neighbors, defendants herein, to sign a guaranty that Larsen would pay for goods furnished him on credit, and, if he did not do so, then they promised to pay his indebtedness without any proceeding first taken against Larsen. Notice of acceptance of the guaranty was waived. The contract, signed by' Larsen, and the guaranty, signed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bradshaw v. BarberSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Marshall Field & Co. v. HaishAppellate Court of Illinois · 1899

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Furst v. BurySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API