Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
On the 16th day of October, 1891, L. N. Trammell, Allen Fort, and Virgil Powers, constituting the railroad commission of Georgia, filed with the interstate commerce commission a petition setting up a violation on the part of the above-named defendants of section 4 of the act of congress, entitled “An act to regulate commerce” (24 Stat. 879). The petition, after setting out that the defendants are common carriers engaged in transporting goods from Cincinnati, Ohio, to points in Georgia, and therefore subject to the act to regulate commerce, complains that the rates…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1896
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1893
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Tift v. Southern Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1903
- Strode v. Meyer Bros. Drug Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
- Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1963
- McGrew v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910