Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California
In Equity. Petition filed by the Interstate Commerce Commission to enforce an order requiring certain railroad companies to desist from charging a greater rate for a shorter than for a longer haul.
1Opinion of the Court
Ross, District .Judge.
This proceeding was instituted by virtue of the sixteenth section of the act of congress entitled “An act to regulate commerce,as amended March 2, 1889, (25 St. at Large, p. 855,) to enforce an order made by the Interstate Commerce Commission on the -19lh day of July, 1890, directing that, from and after September 1, 1890, the defendants, the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company, the Atlantic & Pacific Railroad Company, the Burlington & Missouri River Railroad Company, the California Central Railway Company, the California Southern Railroad Company, the Chicago,…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Western New York & P. R. Co. v. Penn Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
- Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Shinkle v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1894
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1897
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1898
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.