Legal Opinion

Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia

Decided June 3, 1893PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWMAN, District Judge.

This is an application by the interstate commerce commission to this court to enforce an order passed by the commission in the case of the James & Mayer Buggy Company v. The Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company, the Western & Atlantic Railroad Company, and the Georgia Railroad Company.

The petition of the James & Mayer Buggy Company to the interstate commerce commission was as follows:

“The petition of the above-named complainant respectfully shows: (1) That the James & Mayer Buggy Company manufacture buggies, carriages, etc., in the city of Cincinnati,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co. v. OsborneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Western New York & P. R. Co. v. Penn Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
  2. Detroit, G. H. & M. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1897
  4. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1898
  5. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API