Interstate Commerce Commission v. Western & A. R.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Appeals from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Georgia.
1Opinion of the Court
McCORMICK, Circuit Judge.
The three above-styled causes present substantially similar questions of fact and questions of law. They were heard together in the circuit court and in this court. They were severally originated by petitions filed before the interstate commerce commission against the respective appellees by the railroad commission of Georgia. These petitions were filed on October 22, 1891. The gravamen of the petition in the first-named of the above cases was that the appellees charged, collected, and received for freight transportation, by continuous carriage, from the city of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Alabama Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Cincinnati. N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Miami S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1898
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1896
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1892
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lynchburg Traffic Bureau v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1963
- McGrew v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910