Legal Opinion

Mosk v. Summerland Spiritualist Assn.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 9, 1964No. Civ. 27289Published

1Opinion of the Court

225 Cal.App.2d 376 (1964)

STANLEY MOSK, Attorney General, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

SUMMERLAND SPIRITUALIST ASSOCIATION et al., Defendants and Appellants; NAOMI M. MORGAN et al., Interveners and Respondents.

Civ. No. 27289.

California Court of Appeals. Second Dist., Div. Two.

Mar. 9, 1964.

Stanley Mosk, Attorney General, and Edmond B. Mamer, Deputy Attorney General, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Trevey, Schwartz, Wood & Otero and Jack A. Otero for Defendants and Appellants.

Robertson & Westwick and Robert J. Westwick for Interveners and Respondents.

ROTH, J.

[1a] In 1890 H. L. Williams (Williams)…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  2. St. James Church of Christ Holiness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Dimmick v. DimmickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Sorensen v. CostaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. West v. EvansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API