Legal Opinion

State v. Stevens

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 6, 1960No. 367PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The defendants assign as error the failure of the court below to dismiss as of nonsuit at the close of all the State’s evidence.

Ordinarily, when evidence is introduced by the State after a plea of guilty or of nolo contendere, it is introduced for the purpose of determining what punishment should be imposed and not for the purpose of determining the guilt or innocence of the pleader. S. v. Shepherd, 230 N.C. 605, 55 S.E. 2d 79; S. v. Crump, 209 N.C. 52, 182 S. E. 716.

Moreover, the law does not sanction a conditional plea of nolo con-tendere. S. v. Horne, 234 N.C. 115, 66 S.E. 2d 665; S. v.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. State v. SurlesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. State v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. ShepherdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. State v. BowersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  5. State v. BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API