Legal Opinion

State v. Bowers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 8, 1968No. 576PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

Defendant contends the accusations in the warrant in effect charge him with a felony, to wit, larceny from the person.

At common law, both grand larceny and petit larceny were felonies. Now, by virtue of G.S. 14-72, the larceny of property “of the value of not more than two hundred dollars” is a misdemeanor and the punishment therefor is in the discretion of the court. However, G.S. 14-72, according to its express provisions, has no application where “the larceny is from the person.” State v. Cooper, 256 N.C. 372, 124 S.E. 2d 91, and cases cited.

Admittedly, the punishment for larceny from the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. PearceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  2. Cumbest v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  4. State v. MasseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API