Legal Opinion

State v. Benfield

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 10, 1971No. 19PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOBBITT, Chief Justice.

In his charge, the court instructed the jury they could return one of two verdicts, either guilty of larceny from the person or not guilty. They were instructed it would be their duty to return a verdict of guilty of larceny from the person if satisfied from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt “that the defendant Benfield took and carried away forty dollars ($40.00) of United States money, from the person of Tom Mace, without his consent and against his will; that such money was taken and carried away by the defendant with the felonious intent to deprive Tom Mace of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Davis v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BuckomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. ShirleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. State v. WessonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. State v. CorpeningCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  5. State v. RespassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API