Legal Opinion

Windeler v. Scheers Jewelers

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1970No. Civ. 26155PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon a jury verdict awarding plaintiff $4,000 damages for personal injuries and $1,436 for property loss damage resulting from the failure of defendant to return six rings which plaintiff had entrusted to defendant for the purpose of having the stones in said rings removed and reset in a new ring.

Adverting to the facts most favorable to plaintiff, as we must, we observe that at the trial plaintiff testified that upon entrusting the rings to defendant she emphasized the sentimental value of the rings and explained to defendant…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Crisci v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Sloane v. Southern California Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Chelini v. NieriCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Molien v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Erlich v. MenezesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Schroeder v. Auto Driveaway Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API