Legal Opinion
Castrejon v. Apfel
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 2, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-C-1433PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DATED _ ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RECOMMENDATION, REVERSING DEFENDANT’S DECISION, AND REMANDING ACTION TO DEFENDANT FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS.
REYNOLDS, District Judge.
Plaintiff Denise J. Castrejon (“Castre-jon”) brings this action for review of the defendant Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (“Commissioner”) decision denying her claim for supplemental security income. The action was assigned to Magistrate Judge Aaron E. Goodstein for pretrial proceedings; the parties have not consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction.
On January 8, 2001, the magistrate judge…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Donald ROHAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- John S. Young v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Harvey PUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Ernestine KEY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Walker v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kokal v. MassanariDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Gotz v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
- Glomski v. MassanariDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2001
- Harris v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Cherry v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.