Legal Opinion
Cherry v. Barnhart
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided January 7, 2004No. 4:03-cv-00156PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLEARY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff Tresa Faye Cherry (“Cherry”) requests judicial review of the decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security income benefits (“SSI benefits”) under Title XVI, 42 U.S.C. § 1381 et seq. of the Social Security Act. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) and (3), the parties have consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Any appeal of this order will be directly to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Masch v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2005
- Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Barbara Combs v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.