Legal Opinion

Gaskill v. Melella

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1940No. Appeal, 69PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

This action grew out of the collision of two auto mobiles in the early evening of October 9,1938. Defendant maintains that as to John J. Moran, he is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict in favor of that plaintiff. We are unable to find merit in either of defendant’s contentions, that he was not negligent and that this plaintiff is chargeable with contributory negligence.

In the light of the verdict we have no difficulty in finding the following facts established by the testimony: Immediately before the collision, defendant’s car was parked on the west side of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Byrne v. Schultz (Stone)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Jinks v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Wilson v. Consolidated Dressed Beef Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Simon v. Lit Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Riley v. McNaugherSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  2. Landis v. Conestoga Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Kissell v. Motor Age Transit Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  4. Alcaro v. Jean Jordeau, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  5. Gatenby v. Altoona Aviation CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API