Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Iannelli

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1993No. 00820, 00832, 00839, 00846 and 00859PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge.

These cases arose out of an investigation of illegal gambling activities in western Pennsylvania conducted by the Pennsylvania State Police and the Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office. The lead investigator was Trooper Robert Teagarden. In March of 1989, Trooper Teagarden contacted a confidential informant in Uniontown, Fayette County. The informant agreed to have his conversations with Joseph Georgianna tape recorded. During these conversations, the informant and Georgianna discussed line information (the odds on sporting events) and placed wagers on sporting events.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Commonwealth v. EdmundsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. GraySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. BakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. PetrollSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Commonwealth v. SotoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. McNeilSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Commonwealth v. MontgomerySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API