Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Soto

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1997No. Nos. 2922 and 3300PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

In early November of 1988, Angel Soto a/k/a Chino (Soto) and his cousin Luis Torres (Popo) savagely killed Nepomuceno Pacheco (Nepo). The murder, planned and openly discussed for at least one week prior to the actual execution, resulted from a drag dealing dispute. After the duo lured the victim to a desolate quarry, Popo shot Nepo five times throughout the body area. Apparently unsatisfied that these wounds would prove fatal, but out of ammunition, Soto and Popo quickly fled to an acquaintance’s home approximately one mile away to procure more bullets for the murder weapon.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. PaolelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Commonwealth v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Commonwealth v. SaundersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LambertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Commonwealth v. McCoySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Com. v. Bedford, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Cortez, O.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API