Legal Opinion

Forsythe v. Family Court Commissioner

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1986No. 84-833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBablitch, J.

Thomas J. Forsythe, Jr., (Forsy-the) maintains that he has an absolute right, as a party to a postdivorce proceeding before the Family Court Commissioner, Dane County (Commissioner), to record the entire proceeding at his own expense. We recognize his right to record such a proceeding, but cpnclude that exercise of this right is subject to the commissioner's administrative authority. Because we hold that the family court commissioner may limit the method or extent of a party's recording of a proceeding, we uphold the decision of the court of appeals, which affirmed the circuit court's order…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. La Crosse Tribune v. Circuit Court for La Crosse CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  2. In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Prince v. BryantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Strandberg v. StrandbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Martin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. David A. Nowicki v. Lucy Cooper, Assistant Family Court Commissioner, Milwaukee County, Both Personally and in Her Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  3. Dane County v. C.M.B.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  4. In Matter of Mental Condition of CMBWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Forsythe v. Family Court CommissionerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API