Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Earl v. Shafer

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1999No. 98-2548PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the dismissal of Earl’s mandamus action. Earl has an adequate legal remedy by way of a declaratory judgment action in common pleas court to correct his prison record. State ex rel. Konoff v. Shafer (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 294, 295-296, 685 N.E.2d 1248, 1249-1250; State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr. (Oct. 28, 1993), Franklin App. No. 93AP-655, unreported, 1993 WL 435190, affirmed (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 70, 630 N.E.2d 365. There is no evidence of any present injury to Earl that would prevent a declaratory judgment from providing a complete, beneficial, and speedy…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Konoff v. ShaferOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Yonkings v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & CorrectionOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Evans v. BlackwellOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State ex rel. Evans v. Chambers-Smith (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. BulgerOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. State v. BallardOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. State v. HeidelburgOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API