Legal Opinion

Hadix v. Caruso

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 21, 2007No. 06-2591, 06-2628, 07-1344, 07-1503, 07-1608, 07-1609UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this consolidated appeal, the State of Michigan challenges six district court orders arising from a consent decree that governs the conditions of confinement at several Michigan prison facilities. Because a recent opinion by the district court may moot some of these appeals, because the State has agreed to comply with some of the orders underlying these appeals and because both the State’s planned closing of one prison and the district court’s recent decision narrow the scope of these disputes, we remand the orders to the district court to determine which ones, if any, have become moot and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Hadix v. CarusoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2007
  3. Hadix v. CarusoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006
  4. Hadix v. CarusoDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. FemHealth USA, Inc. v. Rickey Williams, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API