Legal Opinion
Hadix v. Caruso
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided April 3, 2007No. 1:92-cr-00110PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ENSLEN, Senior District Judge.
In order to resolve issues presented during the evidentiary hearing of January 31, 2007-February 1, 2007 and in post-hearing filings, the Court now announces its following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.
FINDINGS OF FACT:
In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, the Court reaches the following Findings of Fact:
General Background
1. By Order of February 18, 2000, in accordance with written findings of that date, this Court denied Defendants’ Motion to Terminate the Consent Decree and required Defendants to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hamama v. AdducciDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Hadix v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Evans v. BonnerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2019
- Johnson v. CathersDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2022