Legal Opinion
Hadix v. Caruso
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided December 7, 2006No. 1:92-mj-00110PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
ENSLEN, Senior District Judge.
Step on a man’s foot once, and a polite apology will do. Do it twice, and a profuse apology is in order. Do it thrice, and you have left the land of apology and entered the arena of self-defense.
I. FACTUAL FINDINGS
A. Hearing Process
1. Hearing was held in this matter on October 11-13, 2006 to receive proofs regarding three motions by Plaintiffs. After hearing, which could not accommodate all of the parties’ proofs, the Court issued a scheduling Order, on October 16, 2006, to receive additional proofs (exhibits, de bene esse…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Rhodes v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Helling v. McKinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1993
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hines v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Hadix v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Howard Hines v. Wendell AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Select Distributors, LLC v. Breeze Smoke, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021