Legal Opinion

Hadix v. Caruso

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided November 13, 2006No. 1:92-cr-00110PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, Senior District Judge.

Say a prayer for T.S. and the others who have passed. Any earthly help comes far too late for them.

I. BACKGROUND

1. Procedural History

This Court held an evidentiary hearing regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion to Reopen Judgment Regarding Mental Health Care and Issue a Preliminary Injunction on October 11-18, 2006. Also considered during the hearing were two other motions by Plaintiffs, which will be determined later. The Court has now received supplemental proofs and post-hearing briefs from the parties as to the Motion to Reopen. Given the significance of the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hadix v. CarusoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Estate of Richie Majors v. Roger GerlachCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API