Legal Opinion

Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of Kentwood

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1975No. Docket 19381PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcGregor, J.

This appeal is based largely on stipulated facts.

Plaintiff is a land developer who purchased 17 acres of property in the City of Kentwood, in 1972. The land was zoned R-3, which permits 1- and 2-family homes and garden apartments on platted lots if contiguous to railroads, shopping centers, or industrial zones. Plaintiff purchased the property to build single family homes under the FHA-235 program, but has since decided that the property could not be developed economically as single-family homes, duplexes or apartments.

In general, the parcel of land is bordered by an industrial park on the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Brae Burn, Inc. v. City of Bloomfield HillsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kropf v. City of Sterling HeightsMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Dale v. WhitemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Hammond v. Bloomfield Hills Building InspectorMichigan Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ettinger v. Avon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Ettinger v. Avon TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API